JPEG XL

And someone else is trying that now... wonder if it'll work. Would be strange if it's hardware write protection, because someone was able to put music on it

Oh no, guess it didn't work, because I just heard someone saying: "huh, that's strange"

Oh no, that moment when an OS name sounds similar to your own name and people keep mentioning it every minute... or less XD

It's a cheap USB drive bought from a store here (even has it's branding on it) and the music on it is just 4 Polish songs... WMA files even, so someone put it on there and somehow protected it. Probably just a troll to waste time of other people <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

And no, I don't have any flash drives since I never have any needs for them

bought recently?

But the flash drive got thrown away since everyone gave up on it, including people who work with file management related things... and have been working with it for ages XD

Not a student :p

And not really needed here tbh since you can just use the cloud

a new generation gap

No idea. Files were 2 years old and it was a very cheap drive anyways (4GB USB 2.0)

Probably like... 4 bucks at most

doesn’t worn out flash storage turn read-only?

https://superuser.com/a/543116 seems to confirm that this might be what is going on

I buy them but then rip them right away and barely ever use the optical disk again (except Blu-Ray discs in my Blu-Ray player)

Don't think I even own anything like that... or know anyone who does XD

"Also, it is marked with write-protection, even though there are no registry entries causing that to be so." that explains a lot. There was no registry entry to be found

Some flash drives work as read only when they get old to protect data. At least in my experience.

Transcend flash drives.

that's an inherent property of NAND

That moment when something looks oversaturated, but then you enable a custom ICC profile and it suddenly looks realistic <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

my kingston nvme ssd did that after less than 3 months of use ;D

i couldn't even factory reset or wipe the drive because those functions were not available for some reason

or the drive locking up disabled it

sounds like firmware bug tbh

got a free upgrade thru rma ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

took 6 months to get the replacement tho <:kekw:808717074305122316>

heh

i was "lucky" in that i got my drive a bit after production of that model ended

Did -e 9 in combination with photon noise get fixed? At this point I'm not sure if it's just a coincidence that it works on a certain image or if it actually got fixed

it was incredible tbh. that cgi. that battle choreography. these plainaf & generic character designs. and then that silent but incredibly detailed ending. simply peak entertainment, unfortunately not everyone can enjoy it...

im just afraid that director isn't going to put stuff of this quality for whole season...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQS4K5BtGHo

this may end up being good all the way then

https://qntm.org/files/wordle/index.html

Hello banding, my old friend. You've come to ruin my sight again. ~~I need more sleep XD~~

That moment when a panel is so shit that you barely notice an image only having 64 colors <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Ah, sRGB coverage of 59%...

And not even 8-bit

200 nits XD

Yup, laptop XD

At least it's not mine

Big lol. A client here bought WinZip XD

Every time someone mentions it I lose hope in humanity again... why WinZip, why spending money on it, why not using 7-zip XD

Does anyone remember? It's been 10 years... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh9KBwqGxTI

How can anyone forget such an important piece of history :p

https://twitter.com/garybrannan/status/1482866885989478411?t=MuezsRm4I_m84EWwfZ6AWQ&s=19

```data:video/webm;base64,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```

Ok, met someone who's just cursed. He hates colors (set his vibrance to 40% sRGB mode... default is 50% and it's on a cheap 2008 monitor), scaling with "bicubic smoother" is too sharp for him, he likes things to be blurry, he uses light theme for everything, yet he doesn't like bright stuff and he didn't notice extreme banding in his background (heavy jpeg compression that caused white to even become magenta in some areas)

OMG that's my favorite Gary Brannan, Gary Brannan

<:YEP:808828808127971399> It's NFT related

https://twitter.com/i/events/1483290913858281474

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00946 link to actual doc

p amusing as one guy i was talking abt this with said that anecdotally he didn't get it when his gf did & back then he jokingly attributed that to smoking too much weed

meme (nsfw)

oh no... > https://finance.yahoo.com/news/final-fantasy-vii-porn-interrupts-194500748.html

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/808741974596517928/933155792813694996/jxlmeme.png

terrible artifacts and incorrect fonts™️

Link

that's the meme

<:kekw:808717074305122316>

https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000536.shtml?loclr=blogsig

here's the link in the second screenshot

<@!416586441058025472> sorry i just linked it above

**Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections**: The JPEG XL decoder is 9 times faster than FFmpeg.

i did the percentage wrong but whatever it's just a stupid meme

idc about Firefox even though I use it daily. Why is chrome/chromium not yet supporting jxl?

> For HEVC-x265-YUV444, we used x265 v3.1.1 with no parallelism unless otherwise noted and no chroma subsampling, > with the default speed setting of “medium”. Note that x265 is only an encoder. We used the decoder in FFmpeg at > revision 2d58fa (February 5th, 2020), which is not parallelized, even when the input would allow it.

looks like it

that's what happens when one tries to cut out details without fully understanding their significance, i guess

they do, its just behind the `enable-jxl` flag

as for firefox, its only available on their nightly build

and then edge only supports it via a command line flag, but I think there's a config you can edit somewhere to enable it that way

Chrome has had jxl support for longer than Firefox afaik

I think the better question would be, why they aren't on by default. and that's because jxl is still pretty much an infant in its development cycle, I mean the reference software doesn't even support all the features for the bitstream yet. so its still gonna take a bit before its supported properly

though there is a way to have jxl rendered on the client browser, through wasm and a bit of a hack. i'll probably show that off here once me and the guy making it are happy with it

The libjxl decoder does support all the bitstream features, modulo any remaining bugs

https://twitter.com/daisandconfused/status/1483807703814316032

(I can confirm that it’s not)

but on a slightly related note (this is an Onion-like website): https://web.archive.org/web/20150621230858/http://www.ledailyberet.fr/2015/06/gif-sur-yvette-renommee-jpeg-sur-yvette-a-cause-de-son-manque-danimation

Gif-sur-Yvette is a real town: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gif-sur-Yvette

That is a good overview from the US Library of Congress, though

Woordle 215 X/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟨⬛⬛🟩🟩 ⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩 ⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩 🟨🟩⬛🟩🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 😭

the blind copy paste comparison that jxl decodes faster than ffmpeg admittedly isn't great

https://gidmk.medium.com/cannabis-and-covid-19-859978480f62

Wordle 215 6/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟨⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛ ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟨 ⬛🟩🟩🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

The same principle was in some video game, but with numbers. You had to guess the digital code of the lock in 5 or 6 tries.

words are more fun because the search space is sparse

imo

Wordle 215 4/6 ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟨🟨🟩 🟩🟩⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

how does this work

https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/

I think it might be bugged <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

I'm encoding the future <:Poggers:805392625934663710>

Lol, it's slow motion somehow

Bugged recording of a bug <:PepeOK:805388754545934396>

nah, the original mastermind is better because it doesn't tell you the position of which pegs are (semi-)correct. So you have to use logical deduction to solve it and not just come up with words that fall under a given pattern.

ah yes, would be fun to make a wordle that only gives mastermind clues

Just replace colors with letters and let the secret be selected from a list of words.

<@!794205442175402004> https://github.com/longtonm/MasterMind if you have Java installed

<:FeelsReadingMan:808827102278451241>

Seems pretty fast to me

Haha

Thunder is speed of sound, 1234 km/h This C-FJXL airplane is 262 knots, 485 km/h A perigrine falcon can do 390 km/h

Lightning is speed of light, about 1080000000 km/h

And current fjxl is faster than cjxl -s lightning

ftljxl

km/h 🤨

lightspeed is 300,000 km/s <:YEP:808828808127971399>

It would be funny to take these speeds literally

Depending on screen density, you could say a pixel has dimensions, so you could count how many pixels go in a kilometer

*encodes a 1x100000000 image*

with a dpi of 1

Well a WxH image can also be seen as H rows of W pixels, which you could say has a total length of W*H pixels

yes, but moving across a 2d plane will always be slower then moving across a 1d plane, unless you consider that the encoder walks pixel to pixel with 0 jumps

but encoders never do that

Say you have a 4K screen that is one meter wide, then 3840 pixels are one meter and the whole screen would be 2160 meters worth of pixels

i guess

So let's say 8 megapixels is 2 kilometers

hm, but it wouldn't of traveled 2 kilometers, within that 8 megapixels

if we have a wavy line and we messure from start to finish the distance made isn't going to be close to the distance traveled

and so properly measuring something like that would be a nightmare

if you scan the frame going left to right on even rows and right to left on odd rows, the distance traveled is correct

If you scan in the usual way (always left to right), then I guess distance traveled is about twice as much

yes, but you can't properly messure jumps

because at that point restrain yourself to the jump itself, and your going at 1000x the speed

Anyway, if fjxl does 200 MP/s, that would be equivalent to 50 km/s, or 180000 km/h

if we were to put all the encoded pixels in a line, yea

depending on the pixel size per inch/mm

And depending on the cpu speed

and depending on the hardware the gpu as well.

where the precision is limited by the refresh rate

You could create a dedicated hardware device that simulates a GPU @ 1920x1080 8bit colour depth @ 600hz in order to max out 16 PCIE 4.0 lanes to get maximum precision.

and use said device for dedicated measurement applications

<@!461421345302118401> Is webp2 good for anime?

I haven't test webp2, I think webp2 will merge to av1(avif)? > _wb_ > If I read between the lines of what skal said at the ImageReady v1.2 event, > basically WebP2 is cancelled and they're now refocusing on making avif better. > (which makes sense, webp2 did not really have anything that avif or jxl couldn't do better)

That moment when you show a gif and a 10-bit AV1 video and everyone thinks the video has a way bigger size... gif: 590KB video: 5.99KB.... and higher quality <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

you've got to tell me what content type you're talking about

5.99KB is rather unheard of no?

I believe you but it must be something like a simple pattern

It is very simple. Cartoon, so flat and gif messes it up with noise

Usually it's about 90% smaller with similar or better quality I guess

Discord seems to be having trouble

Who can see this?

https://tenor.com/view/meee-bob-the-minion-pierre-coffin-minions-me-gif-16561919

Yeah

API outages

Connecting seems to be an issue, same for doing things like using emojis and searching

god i love the international standards organization

i love having to pirate the C standard just to prove to someone that calloc() will never initialize to something other than zero

this is a sign of a stable society

:))))))))

You should hear people in wg1 ramble about the utter incompetence of iso

I think at some point enough people might get fed up with it to cause jtc1 to just leave iso and do their own thing instead. It's just inertia that prevents that from happening, imo

Lol, my drunk music style is quite interesting. Like... I apparently listen to stuff like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oday_Fc-Gc

Lol, that actually sounds kinda nice for some reason

From the av1 discord:

GIF - Giant Image File JPEG - Jolly Picture Electronically Given HEIC - Harmful & Evil Image Codec AVIF - Another Video-derived Image Format JXL - Jazzy Xerography, Look!

Can anyone tell me why webp2 exists I think that these are droped avif's algorithms that are less quality.

But little faster encode

It reused the container from WebP, sidestepping a bunch of issues with the HEIF spec

I think it also allowed for more flexible block sizes

It allows floating blocks (NxM blocks that are not naturally aligned to the NxM grid), just like jxl

WebP2 could be instead of AVIF, sort of like an enhanced version with lossless, but when AVIF is aggressively pushed and it is already in popular browsers, there is almost no point in supporting WebP2 in the current implementation If it becomes much better than AVIF in lossy and JXL in lossless, then it will make sense

JXL - Jinxed Xenomorphic Life

WebP - Warning: error bearing Pixels PPM - Pixels Packed, Merely BMP - Bad Microsoft Picture

JXL - **J**oint **X**treme **L**ossy and **L**ossless

Technical Images of Fluctuating Format?

TIFF - Thorny, Idiosyncratic, Flexible Format

Wonder which one of these generally looks the best. Sadly always have to use scaling, because 1440p monitor (nice res for gaming, terrible for content consumption) <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Usually movies I watch are in 1080p, so I use Lanczos, but can't find much if anything at all about some other scaling methods like SincR

"Experimental" sounds good! ^^

Lol. Wonder what it actually is <:kekw:808717074305122316>

Why not use mpv upscalers like ravu or fsrcnxx?

Because I don't use mpv

Madvr?

Not really that much of a reason for me to switch sadly

if you're using mpc just use ngu in madvr

Is there any easy way anyone knows of how I can limit the total amount of colors in a video? Like, want it to be an 8-bit animated image, so only 256 colors

Like, this to apng, but has to be max. 90KB

Does that also work for apng?

Hm, seems it does. Is there an option to disable dithering?

Copy pasting that line was already basically at my limits since I never use ffmpeg and have no idea how to use it XD

And no idea how to make it loop <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

That didn't change anything sadly

Guess I could do it the harder way and upload the result to ezgif and then download it again from there. Then it should loop

paletteuse=dither=none seems to work for no dithering

Nice, that seems to work :o

``ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "fps=10,scale=140:thumbsdown:flags=lanczos,split[s0][s1];[s0]palettegen=max_colors=32:reserve_transparent=0[p];[s1][p]paletteuse=dither=none" -plays 0 output.apng``

I can probably remove some parameters since I don't use scaling though, but no idea what I can remove without it breaking XD

Oh lol, didn't even notice that

``` ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "fps=10,scale=140:-1:flags=lanczos,split[s0][s1];[s0]palettegen=max_colors=32:reserve_transparent=0[p];[s1][p]paletteuse=dither=none" -plays 0 output.apng ```

At least that works

Oh nice. 84.9KB with the apng optimized. Thanks :o

Searching on <:Google:806629068803932281> how big a lossless movie would be gives... funny results <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Lol, imagine thinking a blu ray is 70% audio and 30% video

Almost all forums that I've seen have dumb answers like that. Some claim that lossless compression doesn't even exist and that you always lose data <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

must be audiophiles

or storing their losslessly compressed files on btrfs raid5/6

<@!401816384109150209>

ohhh the burn!

oh i should explain why i pinged damian since that was a different server <:kekw:808717074305122316>

> 60TB [of blu-ray remuxes] > and about 6TB of music > it's all on a Btrfs RAID6 array > no backups

heh, I use raid10 myself, what I read about btrfs 5/6 was somewhat concerning

Lol that moment when your webcam is on 2160@60, but everyone complains it looks bad, because the service they wanted to use is capped to about 800kbps <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/1134 Is it really a good idea?

Darkmode font 1.010 [ Dalton Maag ]** vk

vk.com

```c char **DaltonMaag[]; ```

i would like to do encoding on the gpu, if it means i can encode more at the same time

i just have no idea if any jxl encoding workloads are suited for gpu acceleration

the encoding itself, not very, but the heuristics before that absolutely yes

they must be confusing uncompressed with something like an untouched rip

an uncompressed HD movie should be like 500GB

hhhhmmmmmmm

encoding each frame in bitmaps and wav files

Some interesting conversations about Rust and stuff (also kornel talked about pngquant <https://pngquant.org/rust.html>) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30169263

Also it would be useful to have some sort of simplified Rust version for FJXL (and maybe FPNGE) to make it easier to understand (like QOI) and as an example in another trendy language And the original FJXL can be further used for various experiments for a fast and efficient encoder with more varied methods, without worrying that the code will become less simple

Lol. Wondered what Chrome uses for encoding jpegs and that was the first result <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

https://youtu.be/uo8Ki6qyzfo

I use my phone, so basically free :p

The way bigger sensor size helps a lot and being able to lower the ISO to around 200 too (I always have a decent amount of light, because LED strips and 3 bright monitors)

Only too bad I get the best image quality at 540@30 - 1080@30, because of limited bandwidth and fast low latency settings used by streaming services

I too use phone camera on Linux for webcam. Laptop cams are bad.

<a:CatYes:806636752952754186>

I think I used some proprietary app. Don't know it's name.

Usually I want to hate on YouTube for using 8b and having extremely bad banding issues... but a normie told me he never even noticed banding issues on YouTube...

One of my friends bought a new LCD monitor, and ran it at 640x480, because he said he liked how big everything was

He literally doesn't see banding on YouTuve XD

That's just cursed

He should have just used scaling <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

At least then text shouldn't look messed up

I think that's what I ended up doing for him, but he swore he couldn't see anything wrong with it

Ok, that random guy swears he can't see any banding at all on YouTube

Yet he complains about YouTube quality and claims to have normal vision

And now he claims he has better vision than others and that everything has color banding for him

Guess he's just coming up with excuses now <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Probably he doesn't watch dark videos. Mostly daylight videos.

I have no idea

He keeps claiming different things

First he said he never sees any banding, then he said everything has color banding for him (even irl XD) and now he says color banding doesn't bother him...

https://c.tenor.com/yDFvScNwxF8AAAAM/chicken-chicken-bro.gif

Ok, I have a new thing to hate. 30fps videos with 24fps clips that look choppy af <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

To make him more cursed: he likes Discord light theme

Same guy as who sets his monitor brightness and vibrance very low XD

Apparently his autism causes him to perceive everything as overly vibrant... wish I would have that XD

https://c.tenor.com/Ns__LCMf6sUAAAAM/slap-get-off.gif

i like discord light theme

with text set to black

Gotta embrace that cinematic headache

I sure do love gifs... https://ufile.io/7qasdx5v

758MB for like... 15 seconds or so <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

in all fairness, it’s full HD, seems unoptimized, and if it’s 15 seconds, it’s at 60 fps

hm… tried to ask gifsicle to optimize it and it made it larger

796 MB -> 805 MB

``` gifsicle: warning: huge GIF, conserving memory (processing may take a while) gifsicle: warning: too many colors, using local colormaps (You may want to try ‘--colors 256’.) ```

but anyway, this is clearly not gif’s use case

for what it’s worth, a lossless x264 RGB version (preset “veryslow”) is 1.69 GB

lossless, yes. That gif however is lossy... very lossy

🤔 https://developer.chrome.com/blog/colrv1-fonts/

https://youtu.be/BmqYm5Wwz8M

Interesting how fonts are becoming full vector formats

Kind of strange that it took until 2022 to get full color support in fonts

So is this already some kind of new vector format? And even with the v2 proposal? 🤔

I hope they're not going to keep bloating it until it becomes something that requires a full browser to render it

Like what happened with svg

Bitmaps in fonts seems like a bad idea - the whole point of fonts is that they're vectors and can be scaled to arbitrary sizes.

Also: did they think about how to deal with the concept that you should still have a 'font color' that can be applied?

I think it would be nice if you can specify colors either as absolute colors (like for a flag emoji) or as relative colors (i.e. variants of the actual font color, e.g. darker/brighter, more/less saturated, hue rotated, lower opacity)

https://twitter.com/fr_brennan/status/1452467656708263936?t=43A4n8MULnERf018VBtgew&s=19

wow can't wait for websites to load even slower and be even more broken and inconsistent between browsers

Microsoft came up with the COLR thing for emoji support in Windows 8, actually rather simple and backwards compatible (Tag a path with a palette entry)

Then Google decided to add gradients and filters to it to mimic the SVG font support that Mozilla and Adobe worked on

Still feels strange to me that it was Microsoft that came up with the simple backwards compatible solution

https://youtu.be/l9c_N5eWnf4

-_-

https://eccentricculinary.substack.com/p/pizza-isnt-italian

It hurts my brain when I read those threads.

Oh hey, the most useless update of the decade

They convert **every** avatar to gif and resize them to 100x100...

So it only benefits people who use animated avatars... which are a vast minority and the ones who have an animated avatar use only a few short frames on loop XD

But hey, what to expect from an art website that resizes and compresses uploads that are larger than 1280x720....

Heavy compression since you can actually see clear artifacting in the images most of the time

Would have probably been way better if they would have a size cap instead of res cap... but you can exploit it already and they don't seem to know how to fix it. You can update submissions which replaces an image and then there are no caps except for the 10MB cap <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=adl-linux516-windows&num=4

What specifically makes Windows slower than Linux for libjxl <:Thonk:805904896879493180>

Nothing should, windows is just generally slower due to balk and different methods for implementing cpu fairness.

But with an new i9 that shouldn't even be visible.

#though there was some stuff with the P vs E cores that windows 11 was optimised for first.

I think probably use i5 12400 test is a better idea? only have 6 P-core and avx512(E-core don't have avx512).

I think the P core only ones already outperformed windows. The improvement is in the Linux scheduler being able to handle these different cores now.

https://youtube.com/shorts/kwJBNkAHvlw?feature=share

nice quality for 1968

<:banding:804346788982030337>

That nice feeling when apps actually don't use 8-bit for gradients and look very nice on a 10-bit monitor... but once you drag it onto an 8-bit monitor it suddenly becomes banding hell <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

~~Yes, I know that's not a 10-bit screenshot, but that's how ugly it looks on my 8-bit side monitors <:KekDog:884736660376535040>~~

What 10 bit monitor are you using? Is it good?

Good, kinda meh. Is a gaming monitor

It's better than the average monitor

Samsung C32HG70

That monitor was either good luck or bad luck since the first batch had many issues (dead pixels, extreme backlight bleeding, completely broken panels etc), so the price dropped with 200 bucks <:kekw:910212968405430273>

I haven't really had issues with it, except for backlight bleeding which I've had on all LCD monitors. It's a little worse than on my side monitors, but the monitor is also way brighter than my side monitors. 600 nits is too low for HDR though, so in SDR mode it looks better... even when watching HDR movies since it's just way too dark for that

Daily Quordle #19 6️⃣7️⃣ 8️⃣9️⃣ quordle.com ⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟨🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

I had some fun with 3d rendering in the last few weeks 😄 https://twitter.com/LucaVersari3/status/1493198284994793473 (well, I guess technically 4d rendering)

best font to use in kiwi browser

also conside change calibre

Do you have regular font?

this is the only weight is fo compute

is piated i downloaded Pak_shriftov_Entertainment_One ff0m vk

Ok

https://www.cufonfonts.com/download/redirect/richardo-flacky

https://www.forbes.com/sites/martingiles/2022/02/15/exclusive-startup-cloudinary-becomes-2-billion-unicorn-via-blackstone-investment/?sh=6d01a8ec71f3

Pipe the investment straight into libjxl!

they kind of have been doing that already — I mean I get basically paid to work on jxl (and other image stuff) 🙂

when I started at Cloudinary in 2016, it was a $25 million company

I now work there for 6 years and now it's a $2 billion company

when I started there, I was employee number 30-something

now when we do a weekly company-wide 'town hall', there are 300-something people in the zoom call

coincidence?

<:Stonks:806137886726553651>

80x your valuation with this one weird trick

well most of the hard work is done by people selling the thing to big companies, and by the people at techsupport that are crazy helpful

I'm only doing some backend and researchy stuff 🙂

https://www.hdmotori.it/moto/articoli/n551477/nerva-exe-scooter-elettrico-batterie-autonomia/

How not to do stuff:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/stsjm6/fedora_36_wallpapers_have_been_published_for_beta/

Looks very ugly to me.

I... have no idea. It doesn't say it anywhere and seen different website use different resolutions for them...

Lol Windows. This block got stuck and no matter what's open, it stays there XD

"Among the fields it’s monitoring closely are virtual and augmented reality, as well as blockchain applications and non-fungible tokens." from the article ^ I might wanna follow what your employer will be doing it appears hah

always looking forward to data-specific stuff as "permanent arbitrary data storage" is a damn interesting application of blockchain etc to me and I feel like there's a slim chance of Cloudinary doing stuff in that direction

I know some NFT sites use Cloudinary to host the actual images those tokens are pointing to

I don't think we're planning to actually do stuff there ourselves, but no idea tbh

TBH that sentence sounds like just randomly mentioning some hype words :)

ah I'm huge on the concept of the permaweb, it's just a natural extension of the entire blockchain concept for me

if I may ask, are they any bit redundant from the standpoint of "what if Cloudinary goes under"?

No idea what those sites do

ah, so Cloudinary itself doesn't provide anything for that?

We do have options to have pretty redundant storage, i.e. storing backups in multiple geographically distant datacenters etc

But no idea if those sites do that, or just use the default

knowing life and lazyness in """web3"""

100% the default

maybe if we're on that topic, I very much love how tiny JXL tree art is, as you can store the entire thing on chain without any issues (assuming by on chain one refers to Bitcoin, Ethereum etc and not dedicated data storage networks)

Yes, the title+artist can be larger than the file itself

real bruh

Well, why does no one make different bitrates for one screen resolution? All people are so deluded by the number of pixels...

Guess people associate a certain quality with certain resolutions

I hear many people say "4k looks good, 720p always looks bad"

And then if you have a lossless 720p video (rendered on a 1440p screen with lanczos) they're like: "it's so sharp, is that 4k" XD

as my friend said, people only understand 2 things Here's a black and white TV Oh wow this is it! color TV .

As almost everyone I know says: the eye can only see 24 fps

~~I'm not kidding sadly~~

main thing is not to be on the opposite sidethe , because more frames also do not mean better, especially if you have an inexpensive OLED monitor

I mean THE GOSTING which is often called the response time in milliseconds, but this is not the time from the Monitor to the PC, this is the Another time during which the pixel can change its state... and in this area Movies look best on both new and on old monitors without blurring....

It depends a lot on 24 fps when. Tbh, watching movies gives me a headache, because 24 fps looks somewhat choppy for me, but also depends a little on the sharpness, motion and motion blur in the movie

in fact, you can overclock any monitor by 10-20 hertz higher, even if you have a cheap IPS, but Gosting will ruin your life

And yeah, some screens have absolutely terrible ghosting, but 30 fps honestly already looks waaaaay smoother to me

Hm, overclocking my past old LCD monitors to more than 4Hz higher made them just not accept the signal though

They were just like: ⬛

this should not be, you definitely have a good player that synchronizes with the monitor up to the exact 60 frames

I meet such problems with VLC if I choose the wrong output method

MPC had no such problems

I have it with all players on 144Hz monitors

Same when I watch movies at someone else's place

depends on the monitor of course, but purely technically they never give out exactly 60 frames per second. the spread can reach as much as 1-2%

even on TV?

Especially on TV

24 fits nicely in 144 which somewhat helps

strange of course, although it’s not in vain that there are probably many VSync options for movies

I just watch 2 movies at most. Then it's not that much of a problem. Syncing with movies doesn't help at all since the monitor has consistent timings between every frame

Well, 144Hz monitors do for 24fps movies

On 60Hz or even 50Hz it's absolutely terrible in many cases sadly

Forbidden fruit that I don't want to try, because from all lips it sounds like I tried 120/144 hertz and now I can't stop

My monitor is a pain in that it syncs the backlight to the refresh rate to minimise ghosting, but then doesn't match the "overdrive" to it so low FPS content can look funky

Like Factorio can look odd when panning because it's fixed to 60fps

Sell jxl art as nft using cloudinary XD

Pff, noob Selling jxl art as an nft using the ETH state for storage

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2022/02/version-100-in-chrome-and-firefox/

Why User-Agent parsing libraries have this issue...

Libraries will not have an issue, I assume. It's mostly sites that do some manual UA string parsing, where they might be doing something too simple like just looking at the first two characters to get the major version number.

`just looking at the first two characters to get the major version number.` legacy hard-coded terrorist <:NotLikeThis:805132742819053610>

> Chromium 98.0.4758.102 Arch Linux

https://unity3d.com/unity/whats-new/2021.2.0

Calendar Versioning ❤️

Hey, thought I'd ask here

Any good source of photoshop/gimp textures for free that are royalty free?

This might be a different kind of texture, but this is a really good website for royalty free stuff: https://polyhaven.com/textures

nice for 3d but damn I need something for 2d haha

fine gold dust to be exact

Phoronix?

BIG CODEC

I mean... he's not entirely wrong, AV1 was largely created by companies that focus on web streaming, who were frustrated with the hardware-focused codec licensing model favored by the MPEG members that focused on digital TV and physical media distribution. These companies do benefit from you watching more video. But the monopolizing video codecs is just wrong... most members just want to use it for a specific purpose or selling stuff that supports it. MPEG members have almost the same motivations

gsmarena

https://github.com/Warinyourself/lightdm-webkit-theme-osmos

Lol using Windows on a "work" laptop <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Everything runs as default... including Creative Cloud and these laptops aren't the best

When disabling almost everything I don't need using autoruns <:KekDog:884736660376535040>

Lol. Now this 💩 laptop isn't annoyingly slow XD

Windows using 2GB at idle <:monkaMega:809252622900789269>

Usually it's more like... 2.5GB - 3GB

That's the usage of KDE... with discord, 2 email clients, 6 text pages, desmos, and a youtube page open <:kekw:808717074305122316>

oh and a terminal with htop

Then I'll probably use... 4GB XD

This was also idle btw

But too many background processes...

https://twitter.com/ronaldliive/status/1495882696559669248

https://twitter.com/BBCBweaking/status/1496022069196341254?s=20&t=RzgPgHvnswHkOrdCJok69A

I ran vista with 1gb ram 😂

1GB is the recommended system requirements for vista.

windows Vista aero is ♥️

I think Vista is my favourite looking Windows.

GEM by Digital Research was the only graphical OS that made me go "wow"

That and the Amiga workbench

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MiNT

Sometimes it seems like UI innovation stopped at some point in the 80s

Biggest issue with that is, IMHO, that even mobile platforms are clearly thought top-to-bottom as if the menus at the top are still a good thing. Somehow, our thumbs have not evolved to cover this. Windows Phone, RIP, was a honourable exception to this madness (eg. Android Chome even **removed** address bar at bottom experiment entirely!).

If you would have told me 20 years ago that portrait screens would become extremely common, I don't think I would have believed you.

This is one of my favourite features of Firefox on android. Having the address bar at the bottom feels so much more natural. It always feels like quite some work to open the notifications tray for example, as I have quite a big phone. Fortunately I can swipe on the power button on the side to do it as well.

gnome's windows xp moment.

Daily Hexadecordle #8 🕛🕗🕘🕚9️⃣🔟🕑🕚7️⃣🕐🕓8️⃣🕖🕕🕓🕙

my first time trying out this one

12 blades for 12 times more efficiency than 1 blade

Daily Hexadecordle #8 🕓🕚🕓🕒 🕛🕙4️⃣🕖 🕐5️⃣🕚9️⃣ 🟥🕗🕕🕑 https://hexadecordle.co.uk sigh

Daily Quordle #31 5️⃣6️⃣ 4️⃣7️⃣ quordle.com ⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟩🟨🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Ok. Is 72 Mbit/s enough?

So it looks like per frame size should be less than 150kB

If the hardware supports multiple streams you should be able to (I'd avoid 40Mhz channels personally, uses so much bandwidth that if anybody else nearby also uses it you'll get interference, lowering speeds)

Is there a way to change video scaling methods in Chrome? for me sometimes 1440p streams on Youtube look sharper than 2160p, but 2160p looks sharper than 1440p when I download the video and play it in VLC (1440p monitors)

Maybe don't use Chrome with YouTube in the first place... :D

Lol. Sadly Chrome's the best working browser for me

Well, Chrome and Opera, but don't really like Opera's UI that much

Yes, but why not use VLC (I recommend mpv) for video playback? There should also be addons to play YT videos via VLC. Or just go with FreeTube if you prefer that.

Want to just you know... go to YouTube and click a video without any hassles

comic lol

this is most likely why https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/94628-change-split-threshold-svchost-exe-windows-10-a.html

I forget the exact numbers but this causes in the neighborhood of around 80 or so background processes

I'm pretty sure they let the OS handle video display now if possible, since on macOS/Windows there's various power saving features that are only possible that way

watching a video is a completely different thing compared to using youtube

not being able to like/dislike, read comments, add to playlists, see other videos makes using a video player other than a web browser for youtube useless

it shouldnt even be a suggestion

i like watching ads

i like watching youtube sponsor spots

I often use mpv for youtube, if only because it does proper color management and chrome on windows/linux stopped applying its color management to video playback some time ago

I do the browsing / commenting / etc. in Chrome, but for actual playback, I copy the URL and quickly run `mpv 'https://youtu.be/…'`

with `script-opts = ytdl_hook-ytdl_path=yt-dlp` in my mpv.conf

(as well as `keep-open = yes` and of course `icc-profile-auto = yes`)

Daily Hexadecordle #11 🕘🕛🕑🕐 4️⃣🕓🕓🕒 9️⃣🕚5️⃣🔟 🕕🕖6️⃣7️⃣ https://hexadecordle.co.uk

oh, nice, thanks

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/808742092213715034/947437547854909490/android-users-viewing-a-jxl.mp4

What would you describe as "vividness" of color? How do lightness and monochromaticity interact to create "vividness"? Can intensity be described as a simple `Luma^2 * Chroma` aka `Saturation * Luma` ratio? Or would that be wrong in some way? Would something like `Luma * Chroma + Luma` aka `Saturation + Luma` work better? Or just distance away from black aka `sqrt(Luma^2 + Chroma^2)`?

Saturation and contrast?

<@!794205442175402004>Okay. Then I can describe Vividness as Chroma / Luma.

What about "intensity"?

I know brightness is just mostly Luma.

Would it be reasonable to describe "intensity" as distance from black?

An example, while these colors have almost the same luma, the yellow is clearly much more intense.

And the yellow does have a higher distance from black in the Luma-AB spaces.

Intensity and brightness are usually just synonyms afaik

I would define it as the sum of maxval-minval in Lab space, or something like that.

Stretching contrast and/or saturation increases 'vividness'

How would you define the difference between those yellow and white then?

Yellow is saturated, white not

<@!794205442175402004> Yes, so what kind of metric would you create to distinguish the X of colors where this yellow is more X than this white, but highly saturated red is less X than this white?

Saturation times luma?

Or something like (0.5 + S) * L, say

Or just S + L

Hmm, interesting, okay.

So pretty much some form of distance from black.

Because the product version erases the differences between different L values.

But since maximum possible chroma and direct saturation somewhat depend on luminance,

It is weird to take normal distance or something like S + L.

<@!794205442175402004>I know exactly what I am looking for!

Since chroma is the measurement of monochromaticity, I am looking for the "maximum spectral peak" in a mass of wavelengths of a color.

Because a L 1 C 0 color will have even spectral peaks, when a L 1 C 1 color will have one/two for tech purples very high peak/s that will have a higher maximum value than the C 0 color.

Is there any perceptual equivalent to this?

"Colorimetric impact intensity"?

It's the thing that makes high chroma colors still burn the eyes even if the lightness is low.

lol

Neither can their corporate competitors, it's not like AMD can suddenly start using them

And I personally have no interest or use in the verilog of a GPU core, I'm not making my own any time soon

Let's see what happens on Friday.

True, I do keep forgetting about them

Hope they don't suck, more competition would be nice

Arc is supposedly 2022Q1, aka this month