JPEG XL

Info

info-faq 40

announcements 18

rules 57

Slow mode test 4

suggestions 353

github 35276

reddit 647

moderator-only 0

JPEG XL

jxl 56365

Hi. I strongly believe progressive 12

this is a thread 7

what is your recommendation now with the 62

export version information in headers b... 3

Likely just what was said the Chrome dev 5

Anyone know of a way to create an HDR 16

Progressive-responsive features 87

how to code without artefacts 22

JPEG XL(libjxl) vs Guetzli 12

test 2 14

adobe dng converter is a pile of crap 23

Now in production (Safari, Thorium etc 28

contact-devs 1846

Accuracy of different implem 10

@_wb_ The Early Adopter role gives you 11

That's not the same question, not even 7

Im curious as to why you think a 2.4 18

so you can always tag a PNG with cICP 24

libjxl progress callback 3

libjxl 20536

JNI question 3

streaming mode 13

We're actively working on progressive 28

I had an idea to simplify patch 2

JXL lossless encoder 103

Does JXL support pure single threading 40

Metadata not included in djxl output for cjxl -j or cjxl -d 1 13

v0.5.1 When? 1

JPEG XL GIMP Plugin for Windows 119

Where is libjxl 0.4? 6

tools 4225

I would try Krita 3

benchmarks 16518

Lossless Tuning 136

At this time I have 380 images from 117

Lossy quality 55

mineimage 7

predictors/residuals/context visualizations 14

Images which show texture (stone etc.) 18

FPNGE 38

coverage 11395

Feature nice blog posts and articles on jpegxl info page 1

Until it waterfalls and the initial 6

Currently libjxl doesn't render `lqip`, 11

bug 3

Weird Image Formats 4

blog jpeg xl personal list 9

ChatGPT writes a JPEG XL anime 12

website 1655

adoption 20712

decode speed measurement 47

nomacs 7

FFmpeg 5.0 + JXL 10

UI 11

chrome 34

image-compression-forum 0

lossless e10 fails 143

Specification issues 2110

glitch-art 989

jxl-art 7615

128-byte September 2021 compo 7

August 2021 compo 51

1024-byte September 2021 compo 15

32-byte September 2021 compo 35

Unrestricted Autumn compo 10

64-byte Autumn compo 44

encode-params 1184

devs-only 0

General chat

welcome 3810

introduce-yourself 291

I think I did not introduce myself yet. 7

color 1414

photography 3435

Gainmap Handling in JXL 21

other-codecs 23765

[sorry for the spam] Just wanted to say 28

JPEG2000 support removed from Safari 18 1

HTJ2K + FPGA 21

on-topic 24923

ImageMagick bug or Gwenview bug? 6

more thoroughly 2

Highway on Rust 31

EXR -> JXL Encoding 44

JPEG optimization 7

off-topic 22701

Windows %time% 1

general-forum 0

Voice Channels

General 2147

Archived

bot-spam 4380

That's not the same question, not even

1 - 7

Traneptora

	monad That's not the same question, not even close. Banning people for lack of knowledge, skill or intelligence is not helpful. If \_wb_ were to implement that, he'd have to ban the whole server.
2024-02-03 03:52:48
2024-02-03 03:52:50	It is the same question asked twice, verbatim first, `Does jpeg xl support YUV?` and then `What about YUV 4:2:0, 4:2:2, and 4:4:4?` wdym it's not the same question? the issue isn't that the user lacks knowledge, but they're likely someone feeding text into a large language model and copy/pasting the result

monad

2024-02-03 05:18:56	The second has numbers. That's plenty enough for a naive person wading through murky semantics.
2024-02-03 06:12:58	Given we're not Stack Exchange, that's all hardly relevant.

Traneptora

2024-02-03 06:28:11	no, the same questiom was asked verbatim on both here and reddit despite the varying answers
2024-02-03 06:28:26	but I agree that it's not ban worthy. just annoying

monad

2024-02-03 06:41:07

I was responding to your comment on Reddit (which the dude who made the ban request quoted and repeated). Yes, posting both places at once is perhaps poor etiquette, but surely practical from the poster's perspective. Anyway, the ban request and follow-up were deleted, so whatever.