JPEG XL

Info

rules 57
github 35276
reddit 647

JPEG XL

tools 4225
website 1655
adoption 20712
image-compression-forum 0

General chat

welcome 3810
introduce-yourself 291
color 1414
photography 3435
other-codecs 23765
on-topic 24923
off-topic 22701

Voice Channels

General 2147

Archived

bot-spam 4380

Lossy quality

Scope
2021-10-05 05:31:49
1. Current JXL 2. <https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/689>
2021-10-05 05:32:13
2021-10-05 05:32:13
2021-10-05 05:32:15
2021-10-05 05:32:16
2021-10-05 05:32:18
2021-10-05 05:32:19
2021-10-05 05:32:21
2021-10-05 05:32:22
2021-10-05 05:32:25
2021-10-05 05:32:25
2021-10-05 05:32:28
2021-10-05 05:32:28
2021-10-05 05:32:31
2021-10-05 05:32:32
2021-10-05 05:32:35
2021-10-05 05:32:35
2021-10-05 05:32:44
2021-10-05 05:32:45
2021-10-05 05:32:49
2021-10-05 05:32:50
2021-10-05 05:32:53
2021-10-05 05:32:54
2021-10-05 05:32:57
2021-10-05 05:32:57
2021-10-05 05:33:00
2021-10-05 05:33:01
2021-10-05 05:33:03
2021-10-05 05:33:04
2021-10-05 05:33:07
2021-10-05 05:33:08
2021-10-05 05:33:10
2021-10-05 05:33:12
2021-10-05 06:06:10
2021-10-05 06:06:15
2021-10-05 06:06:49
Same size comparison And yes, #689 is better, the images are smoother, but there are less noticeable artifacts and are overall more pleasing to the eye Though, still needs improvements on eliminating the ringing artifacts (because they remain the most noticeable and annoying)
Scope 1. Current JXL 2. <https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/689>
2021-10-06 12:56:46
<https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/pull/691>
2021-10-06 12:56:59
2021-10-06 12:57:00
2021-10-06 12:57:00
2021-10-06 12:57:01
2021-10-06 12:57:02
2021-10-06 12:57:02
2021-10-06 12:57:05
2021-10-06 12:57:06
2021-10-06 12:57:06
2021-10-06 12:57:09
2021-10-06 12:57:09
2021-10-06 12:57:10
2021-10-06 12:57:12
2021-10-06 12:57:13
2021-10-06 12:57:14
2021-10-06 12:57:15
2021-10-06 12:57:16
fab
2021-10-06 01:04:21
thanks