|
_wb_
|
2021-03-18 03:10:20
|
General info:
Official page: https://jpeg.org/jpegxl
Reference software: https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl
J40 (independent decoder): https://github.com/lifthrasiir/j40
Community jxl page: https://jpegxl.info
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/jpegxl/
JXL viewers for Windows:
https://www.xnview.com/
https://www.reddit.com/r/jpegxl/comments/l4nwb2/how_to_view_jpeg_xl_images_in_nomacs_for_windows/
Latest libjxl builds:
https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/actions/workflows/release.yaml
https://artifacts.lucaversari.it/libjxl/libjxl/latest/
Browser support: (https://caniuse.com/jpegxl)
- Chromium bug: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058
- Chromium code review: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2749318
- Firefox bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539075
|
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
2021-03-23 04:51:17
|
Question: Why don't we have `.jxl`, `.jxll` and `.ajxl` to better discern lossy/lossless/animated files?
Answer: https://www.reddit.com/r/jpegxl/comments/maabyj/newbie_question_regarding_jpeg_xl_file_extension/grsas4a/
|
|
|
eddie.zato
|
2021-04-18 07:29:17
|
JXL viewers for Windows:
ImageGlass since v8.1.4.18 - https://github.com/d2phap/ImageGlass/releases
|
|
|
Jim
|
2021-04-23 11:59:18
|
<@228116142185512960>'s JXL tree art web encoder:
https://jxl-art.surma.technology/
|
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
2021-07-03 02:31:12
|
Bitstreams and reference images for testing conformance of JPEG XL decoders: https://github.com/libjxl/conformance
|
|
|
eddie.zato
|
2021-09-22 05:28:22
|
JXL viewers for Windows:
qimgv since 1.0.0 https://github.com/easymodo/qimgv/releases
|
|
|
|
chafey
|
2022-03-02 03:33:25
|
HTJ2K vs JPEG-XL Progessive Lossless performance comparison: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/chafey_jpeg-xl-vs-htj2k-progressive-lossless-decoding-activity-6904809034528935936-h9NM
|
|
|
CQ | (☞゚ヮ゚)☞
|
|
chafey
HTJ2K vs JPEG-XL Progessive Lossless performance comparison: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/chafey_jpeg-xl-vs-htj2k-progressive-lossless-decoding-activity-6904809034528935936-h9NM
|
|
2023-01-04 10:21:23
|
Is this posted anywhere not linkedin? (Edit: ah, I see the link to the google doc 👍)
|
|
|
Luke Lampbell
|
2024-03-14 07:32:57
|
Hi everyone
Nice to meet you
|
|
|
Demiurge
|
|
CrushedAsian255
|
2024-10-09 06:09:16
|
FAQ: What is JPEG XL?
JPEG XL is a new image format with unrivaled file sizes. JPEG XL files are on average 40-50% larger than their PNG counterparts. It even has a special JPEG decompression mode that can make most common JPEG files 15-20% larger with no quality gains.
/s
|
|
|
Demiurge
|
2024-10-15 09:07:07
|
**Extra Larger**
|
|
|
CrushedAsian255
|
2024-10-15 10:11:47
|
JPEG Xylophone Loader
The format can only display half-processed images of xylophones
|
|
2024-10-24 03:17:05
|
i don't quite understand the question, where is ``` if (distance > 0.f && distance < 0.01f) {
distance = 0.01f;
}```?
|
|
|
spider-mario
|
2024-10-24 08:59:23
|
what question, or do you mean code?
|
|
|
Tirr
|
2024-10-24 09:00:01
|
moved to https://discord.com/channels/794206087879852103/804324493420920833/1298846209858863104 it seems
|
|
|
JesusGod-Pope666.Info
|
2025-05-02 12:28:35
|
Hmm anyway to make it work on browsers?
|
|
|
DaKarma
|
|
JesusGod-Pope666.Info
Hmm anyway to make it work on browsers?
|
|
2025-05-02 10:19:41
|
I think there is something like a mozilla firefox plugin, and one of them supports jpeg xl,
saw that in a WaterFox review recently, I think you can probably find a way to add this plugin to other firefox based browsers
|
|
|
𝕰𝖒𝖗𝖊
|
|
DaKarma
I think there is something like a mozilla firefox plugin, and one of them supports jpeg xl,
saw that in a WaterFox review recently, I think you can probably find a way to add this plugin to other firefox based browsers
|
|
2025-05-02 02:01:13
|
firefox based browsers already support JXL without plugins
|
|
|
DaKarma
|
2025-05-02 02:02:25
|
oh i thought it wasn't the case yet
|
|
|
username
|
2025-05-02 02:04:46
|
there's more nuance then that. Firefox does not support JXL while Firefox Nightly has really basic support that's off by default, and some forks of Firefox have full JXL support that's enabled by default
|
|
|
JesusGod-Pope666.Info
|
|
username
there's more nuance then that. Firefox does not support JXL while Firefox Nightly has really basic support that's off by default, and some forks of Firefox have full JXL support that's enabled by default
|
|
2025-05-02 11:36:15
|
What forks?
|
|
|
Dr. Taco
|
2025-05-03 01:47:09
|
Waterfox does, switched to it a few weeks ago when FF started selling user data. It's literally just "better firefox". highly recommend
|
|
|
JesusGod-Pope666.Info
|
2025-05-03 01:58:37
|
Waterfox okay.
|
|
|
gb82
|
2025-05-03 04:49:11
|
zen browser also supports jxl
|
|
|
diskorduser
|
2025-05-03 08:22:28
|
Floorp
|
|
|
Crite Spranberry
|
2025-05-25 07:38:11
|
<:r3dfox:1241388495725924432>
|
|
2025-07-04 03:27:18
|
https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/976493999466623016.webp?size=48&name=pooh
|
|
|
CrushedAsian255
|
|
Crite Spranberry
https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/976493999466623016.webp?size=48&name=pooh
|
|
2025-07-06 04:53:29
|
你好习近平 🥰
|
|
|
Crite Spranberry
|
2025-07-06 06:50:35
|
https://tenor.com/view/pooh-hi-hey-hello-hit-there-gif-13399812
|
|
|
Demiurge
|
2025-07-27 12:11:16
|
-500 social credit has been deducted
|
|
|
pixyc
|
|
Demiurge
-500 social credit has been deducted
|
|
2025-07-27 03:41:25
|
-500, deducted. so 500 added
|
|
|
Demiurge
|
2025-07-27 04:40:55
|
Clever
|
|
|
B…G
|
2025-08-12 07:45:25
|
Hey guys
|
|
|
jonnyawsom3
|
2025-08-12 07:49:02
|
Account made 2 days ago with odd links in their Bio... Maybe be cautious
|
|
|
lalovoe
|
2025-08-29 02:23:11
|
it says likely spammer
|
|
|
Crite Spranberry
|
2025-09-10 03:05:07
|
|
|
2025-09-25 02:12:22
|
|
|
|
Meow
|
|
Crite Spranberry
|
2025-11-10 08:01:04
|
[stickfiguremoredots](https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/1218099656710688830.gif?size=48&animated=true&name=stickfiguremoredots)
|
|