JPEG XL

Info

rules 58
github 38694
reddit 688

JPEG XL

tools 4270
website 1813
adoption 22069
image-compression-forum 0
glitch-art 1071

General chat

welcome 3957
introduce-yourself 294
color 1687
photography 3532
other-codecs 25116
on-topic 26652
off-topic 23987

Voice Channels

General 2578

Archived

bot-spam 4577

That's not the same question, not even

Traneptora
2024-02-03 03:52:48
2024-02-03 03:52:50 It is the same question asked twice, verbatim first, `Does jpeg xl support YUV?` and then `What about YUV 4:2:0, 4:2:2, and 4:4:4?` wdym it's not the same question? the issue isn't that the user lacks knowledge, but they're likely someone feeding text into a large language model and copy/pasting the result
monad
2024-02-03 05:18:56 The second has numbers. That's plenty enough for a naive person wading through murky semantics.
2024-02-03 06:12:58 Given we're not Stack Exchange, that's all hardly relevant.
Traneptora
2024-02-03 06:28:11 no, the same questiom was asked verbatim on both here and reddit despite the varying answers
2024-02-03 06:28:26 but I agree that it's not ban worthy. just annoying
monad
2024-02-03 06:41:07 I was responding to your comment on Reddit (which the dude who made the ban request quoted and repeated). Yes, posting both places at once is perhaps poor etiquette, but surely practical from the poster's perspective. Anyway, the ban request and follow-up were deleted, so whatever.